Chembusters and Cloudbusters

There is a lot of controversy on this subject now, and to be honest I consider it important to distinguish between a Croft-style Chembuster and a Reich-style Cloudbuster. After having had a chance to experiment with both devices, I find that they are indeed different in function.

A Cloudbuster is a device invented by Wilhelm Reich about seventy years ago, and it uses orgone energy to influence weather patterns. It is basically an array of parallel pipes which are in turn connected by means of rubber or other organic hoses to either an ORAC or a body of moving water. It relies on the circulation of orgone energy within the water bodies of the earth to clean the orgone by virtue of the action of moving water over stone, this action takes place in riverbeds especially. A Chembuster (or Croft-style Cloudbuster) is a slightly different device, which is based on the Cloudbuster in that it uses a parallel array of pipes to channel orgone energy, in order to affect the weather patterns in the area around it. The main difference between a Cloudbuster and a Chembuster are that a Chembuster has a ballast of orgonite, while a Cloudbuster is grounded directly from the pipes to the earth, or water. And since orgonite processes orgone energy instead of simply collecting it or moving it around a Chembuster cleans the orgone as it passes through. A cloudbuster does not.
Although both Cloudbusters and Chembusters generally pull orgone in the form of DOR down from the atmosphere and channel it into the Earth, it is possible for both devices to work in the opposite direction and send orgone form the Earth into the atmosphere. In both cases, it is the changing orgone fields which affect weather patterns. I do not approve of novices using Reich-style Cloudbusters, but I do approve of just about anyone using Chembusters. This is because a Chembuster is a great deal more user-friendly than a Cloudbuster. A Cloudbuster, used carelessly, can cause tornadoes, imbalances in the earth's orgone fields, and torrential rains or severe droughts. It is nonetheless a very useful device, but one which requires knowledge both of meteorology and orgonomy in order to operate beneficially. The Chembuster, on the other hand, functions more like a 'safety release valve' between the earth and atmosphere, so that it becomes more active when there is a large unbalance in the ambient orgone fields and less active when the energy around it is in a balanced and healthy state.
I have some other articles coming which go into this matter further, but for now suffice it to say that you can cause problems with a Cloudbuster if you do not know what you are doing, but this is not true of a Chembuster, and that is because a Chembuster uses orgonite and quartz crystals to clean the orgone as it passes through, whereas a Cloudbuster does not. It is possible to further enhance the function of a Chembuster by grounding it to the earth. After experimenting with it for some time, I generally ground the orgonite base of my Chembuster instead of grounding the pipes, because if you ground the pipes, then the device will appear to work more rapidly, but what it is actually doing is dumping the excess
DOR into the ground rather than cleaning it. In my opinion, grounding the copper pipes directly is no better than a Reich style cloudbuster, because it is just dumping the DOR into the ground. If you are doing this, then you ought to add some HHGs and TBs or equivalent right near the ground wire where it enters the ground. Also, a wet ground is better than a dry ground. It is better to ground the Chembuster to moving water or wet earth than to dry earth. If you are grounding it to dry earth, you should use a long wire to maximize contact with the earth. You can either attach a length of copper wire to the orgonite, or just cut the bottom out of your bucket and let the orgonite touch the earth.
Jon Logan